Putting aside the merits of the recently enacted law creating same-sex marriage in New York, the way it was approved raises some important legal questions; specifically about the application of two constitutional provisions to the unconventional process of the amendment's passage in the Senate.
Defending marriage on the firm ground of reason and respect for human dignity. Encompassing the marriage related topics of gendered biology, kin anthropology, family law and policy.
Comment Policy
Disputes of fact and of opinion are why we are here. We may disagree with you, just as we hope you share your disagreements with us. Being friendly will usually invite friendly replies. We can and will delete otherwise great posts for unseemly profanity.
Comments anywhere on the site -- no matter how old the post -- will show up on the front page as a recent comment and in the comment RSS feeds.
Comments anywhere on the site -- no matter how old the post -- will show up on the front page as a recent comment and in the comment RSS feeds.
Thursday, June 30, 2011
William Duncan: New York marriage bill suffers from procedural infirmities
Posted by
On Lawn
As a part of "Where's the Threat?" series, we look at what democratic protections and discourse was thrown under the bus in New York. It seems all to common. A good recap of this is from William Duncan:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments,:
Post a Comment