Comment Policy

Disputes of fact and of opinion are why we are here. We may disagree with you, just as we hope you share your disagreements with us. Being friendly will usually invite friendly replies. We can and will delete otherwise great posts for unseemly profanity.

Comments anywhere on the site -- no matter how old the post -- will show up on the front page as a recent comment and in the comment RSS feeds.

Monday, April 11, 2011

Finally, an idea to be excited about...

Back in the early part of the 2000's decade, (the naughts, the naughties?) I did a brief stint as an automotive blogger. My inspiration for doing so was the excitement over the new "retro-futurism" that was then hitting the Detroit scene. Over the next few years, we would see retro-inspired models for the Mustang, Camaro, Charger, etc... My first post there was labeled "Finally a car to be excited about", specifically about the Mustang which was designed after the 1967 Mustang. It was a move I had advocated for many years.

Well, this week, another retro-futuristic idea has hit the field of domestic relationships. See, long before Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships, Hawaii responded to the needs of non-marriageable couples with "reciprocal beneficiaries". In their incarnation they were pretty much Civil Unions or Domestic Partnerships. They were replaced with CU's later, if memory serves me correctly.

Coincidentally, before I met Chairm and the other Opine Editorialists, they were hanging out at a site called "Dust in the Light", run by the brilliant writer Justin Katz.

Now I can see this retro-futuristic alignment in legislation brought before the Rhode Island legislature, promoting -- you guessed it -- a Reciprocal Beneficiaries program. But this time its better and it seems just what I've been advocating for years. Go ahead now, read it. He's spot on, and there isn't anything I have to add.


0 comments,:

Post a Comment