The "substantial resources" universities expend to sponsor gender-sensitivity training and interviewing workshops would be better spent on addressing the real causes of women's underrepresentation, Ceci and Williams say, through creative problem-solving and policy changes that respond to differing "biological and social realities" of the sexes.Yes, that's what it said. Read on. People. Read on.
Defending marriage on the firm ground of reason and respect for human dignity. Encompassing the marriage related topics of gendered biology, kin anthropology, family law and policy.
Comment Policy
Disputes of fact and of opinion are why we are here. We may disagree with you, just as we hope you share your disagreements with us. Being friendly will usually invite friendly replies. We can and will delete otherwise great posts for unseemly profanity.
Comments anywhere on the site -- no matter how old the post -- will show up on the front page as a recent comment and in the comment RSS feeds.
Comments anywhere on the site -- no matter how old the post -- will show up on the front page as a recent comment and in the comment RSS feeds.
Friday, February 11, 2011
There's a real difference between men and women!
Posted by
Renee
Choices -- Not Discrimination -- Determine Success for Women Scientists, Experts Argue
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
If you click the link and go to the full article on Science Daily, it mentions the "Feb 7th issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences." That journal's pub date is actually Feb. 8th, AND, there's no study from Williams & Ceci in there. Which made me wonder what else Science Daily got wrong.
ReplyDeleteCornell's paper has a significantly different slant, btw.
Nothing is wrong with Science Daily, but we do know from past dealings with you is that you have no credibly to contribute to this blog in support or criticism. The irony is you expect your view point to be respect compared to Science Daily. Why should it, considering the cruel and attacking nature of your public thoughts of me and Opine on your blog though an anonymous persona?
ReplyDeleteYou can't talk with a paper bag on your head and be respected.
Back to topic.
I care about women being educated and using their knowledge to the fullest extent by having true flexibility that family and career shouldn't be at odds with another, yet we can find a creative way to work with both. First we have to acknowledge that women (and men) do care about having babies, and we need to plan even as young female high school students careers paths that can obtain both.
We're heading in a better direction and that's awesome.
Reading the paper.... right now.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.human.cornell.edu/hd/loader.cfm?csModule=security/getfile&PageID=60893
At the end.
"The linear career path of the modal male scientist of the
past may not be the only route to success, and departments and
universities should be encouraged and funded to experiment
with alternate lifecourse options. A partnership between the
academy and federal funding agencies could be instrumental in
researching such alternatives."
Some great stuff in there.