In the Los Angeles Times, a "moderate" and a marriage neutering advocate try to make a case that the GOP is hurtling itself towards supporting marriage neutering.
Since the commentary and my analysis is heavy on GOP party issues, my full analysis is over at my namesake blog.
What exactly is considered "anti-gay"? This is a common tactic of marriage neutering advocates. They want the average person to picture mobs of people beating people because they identify as gay, and say, "I'm not anti-gay!" Then the marriage neutering advocates do a bait and switch and equate that definition of "anti-gay" with "defends bride+groom requirement in marriage".
0 comments,:
Post a Comment