Comment Policy

Disputes of fact and of opinion are why we are here. We may disagree with you, just as we hope you share your disagreements with us. Being friendly will usually invite friendly replies. We can and will delete otherwise great posts for unseemly profanity.

Comments anywhere on the site -- no matter how old the post -- will show up on the front page as a recent comment and in the comment RSS feeds.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

UPDATE: Anti-8 Trial Evidence in a Nutshell.

BUMPED AND UPDATED 28 JANUARY 2010


William C. Duncan is the director of The Marriage Law Foundation. During the opening weeks of the federal trial against the California Marriage Amendment, Duncan wrote concise summaries of the Plaintiff's "Evidence in a Nutshell".

Here are quotes from his series thusfar:

Nutshell I

An academic historian says that marriage has changed through time and has nothing to do with children, but she can’t answer the question of whether it is “infinitely elastic.”

Nutshell II

[A] lesbian writer who married in California before Proposition 8 to defy the “fundamentalist, warmongering regime in Washington” described her feelings about being able to marry a same-sex partner.

[Click here to read the middle of the blogpost.]

Nutshell III

[T]he mayor of San Diego explained that he had changed his opinion about the definition of marriage because his daughter came out as a lesbian.

Nutshell IV

[A Stanford University politics] professor (presumably unfamiliar with the Civil Rights movement, pro-life efforts, anti-gambling initiatives, etc.) says the interdenominational cooperation of religious groups in favor of Proposition 8 is “unprecedented.”

Nutshell V

David Boies badgers a Chinese American chemical engineer who supported Proposition 8 about his thoughts about same-sex marriage in order to show, presumably, that they are bigoted...

Nutshell VI

On Friday, an academic psychologist testified that, while the subject is complicated, most people who identify as gay or lesbian do not feel they have chosen their orientation. He noted his own survey that reported 88 percent of gay male and 68 percent of lesbian respondents said they had no choice in their orientation.

Also see "Extrapolating Choice.

Nutshell VII

The attorneys defending Proposition 8 began presenting their witnesses today. First, a political-science professor describes the growing political power of advocates of gay rights.

UPDATE:

Nutshell VIII

On Tuesday, David Blankenhorn explained that the purpose of marriage has never been to express animus towards gays and lesbians. He testified that redefining marriage would exacerbate the trend towards deinstitutionalizing marriage so that it becomes nothing more than a tenuous contractual arrangement focused on individual fulfillment.

Also Read: "Proposition 8 Trial - Evidence Portion Ends."

The judge will schedule closing arguments, probably in a few weeks. [...] A number of witnesses for the defense were unwilling to go on the stand when it seemed likely the trial would be televised and become an Internet spectacle.

Also Read Playful Walrus: "Testimony Finished in Proposition 8 Trial."

* * *

More from William Duncan:

"Religion in the Proposition 8 Trial."

"Is Same-Sex Marriage Conservative?."

1 comments,: