Comment Policy

Disputes of fact and of opinion are why we are here. We may disagree with you, just as we hope you share your disagreements with us. Being friendly will usually invite friendly replies. We can and will delete otherwise great posts for unseemly profanity.

Comments anywhere on the site -- no matter how old the post -- will show up on the front page as a recent comment and in the comment RSS feeds.

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Answering Ted Olson: Updates

Update: 31 January 2010.

In a series of blogposts, I'll offer my answer to Ted Olson, the litigator who wrote an article for Newsweek in which he argued against the California Marriage Amendment. His article was published before the trial began. If Olson presents significant new arguments during the federal trial, I'll consider them as well.

I'll update this blogpost and bump it forward as I add more to this series.

Introduction: Answering Olson's Pro-SSM Argument.

No State Right to SSM.

Favoritism Is Not Equal Treatment.

Bait and Switch.

No Special Reason.

* * *

Update: 31 January 2010.

State Disinterest.

Selective Immutability.

* * *

0 comments,:

Post a Comment