Comment Policy

Disputes of fact and of opinion are why we are here. We may disagree with you, just as we hope you share your disagreements with us. Being friendly will usually invite friendly replies. We can and will delete otherwise great posts for unseemly profanity.

Comments anywhere on the site -- no matter how old the post -- will show up on the front page as a recent comment and in the comment RSS feeds.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

"Marriage Equality": The Big Lie

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.” Adolf Hitler

“The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.” Joseph Goebbels

"A lie told often enough becomes truth." Vladimir Lenin

The claim that non-marriage equals marriage is such a lie. In the minds of too many it is now becoming the "truth" and a great many homosexuals are living this lie in mock marriages.

The fundamental raison d'être for marriage throughout history and in all cultures has had two fundamental criteria: Complementarity of the sexes and the possibility for responsible procreation.

Homosexual relationships fail on both counts and therefore cannot possibly form a marriage.

"Marriage equality" is a propaganda slogan for the masses to consume so that in time, repeated often enough, non-marriage may be called "marriage." The non-equal is claimed to be equal. The claim is a total lie.

It is a total lie also because in the real sense homosexuals already have marriage equality, but it is not mock marriage, it is real marriage through the fulfillment of the marriage criteria. This is not denied to any homosexual. If for whatever reason homosexuals don't wish to marry someone of the opposite sex that is not society's concern. In our democracy they can do as they please except the impossible. The impossible can only be done as the big lie.

In the relentless work to spread the big lie, Cleve Jones, at the Utah homosexual pride festival on June 7th, told the crowd soaking in the rain that he plans to march on Washington on Oct. 11th to coincide with National Coming Out Day so as to "establish equal rights" for homosexuals and transgender people. What he means is "special rights" because they already have equal rights. He took the opportunity to also lampoon the Mormons and stated that he has had thousands of e-mails from Latter-day Saints who offered apologies for the Mormon Church supporting Proposition 9. Can you imagine thousands of Mormons emailing Cleve Jones to apologize for anything? http://www.sltrib.com/ci_12541176

The propaganda slogan of the march will be "marriage equality."

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

7 comments,:

  1. Congratulations, Jose, you Godwin'd on the first sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry, PersonalFailur but you totally misunderstood what was being said. The comparison is not with Nazis or with Communists, Lenin on the 3rd paragraph, but with propaganda methods in general. It's actually a follow up my earlier post "propaganda as Language Manipulation. It's really exactly what George Orwell was pointing out in his works.

    Avoid knee-kerk reaction when you see the name Hitler and actually try to understand what is being said. My point is that homosexualists are cleverly manipulating language to achieve their ends. This is clearly demonstrated when things that are not equal are claimed to be equal. You should reread the post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well said Jose.

    Since when do liberals believe that "separate is equal"? I can't think of a faster way to have a "second-class marriage" than to exclude one gender, based on nothing more that sexist bias.

    And personally, I'm okay with that. If being gay means you have to settle for a second-class "marriage", I'm willing to live and let live. But I'm NOT willing to pretend that separate is in fact equal after all, and that 2 "moms" are equal to a mother and father.

    Why? Because I'm not a sexist bigot, that's why.

    ReplyDelete
  4. (Didn't like all the typos in my comment so here it is again cleaned up. Also included at the end is some information on George Orwell and "The Big Lie" found in Wikipedia.)

    Sorry, PersonalFailure but you totally misunderstood what was being said. The comparison is not with Nazis or with Communists, Lenin on the 3rd paragraph, but with propaganda methods in general. It's actually a follow up on my earlier post "Propaganda as Language Manipulation. It's really exactly what George Orwell was pointing out in his works.

    Avoid knee-jerk reactions when you see the name Hitler and actually try to understand what is being said. My point is that homosexualists are cleverly manipulating language to achieve their ends. This is clearly demonstrated when things that are not equal are claimed to be equal. You should reread the post.

    George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four refers to the Big Lie theory on several occasions. For example:

    “The key-word here is blackwhite. Like so many Newspeak words, this word has two mutually contradictory meanings. Applied to an opponent, it means the habit of impudently claiming that black is white, in contradiction of the plain facts”.
    “To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed...”

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think it is ironic that all Godwin's law really did was create a bunch of don't-talk-about-Nazis nazis.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Heh, On Lawn. So the next time one of our beloved homosexualists compares anti-gay discrimination to 'the holocaust' we can invoke Godwin and tell them to shut up. :P

    ReplyDelete
  7. Godwin's Law has more to do with the probability of invoking the Nazis than a warning against it.

    Godwin's Law: "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."

    Though the tactics of throwing the Hitler and Goebbels quotes up as the opening line may not serve in the best interests of making friends, winning over people in the argument, etc.

    ReplyDelete